<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: Arturo Fuente Anejo Robusto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/06/17/cigar-review-arturo-fuente-anejo-robusto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/06/17/cigar-review-arturo-fuente-anejo-robusto/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews. Cigar Smokers and Shops – A Cigar Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/06/17/cigar-review-arturo-fuente-anejo-robusto/#comment-56450</link>
		<dc:creator>howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 05:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-56450</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d give the shark a 95+ rating. I smoked a few of the sahrk when they were released , GREAT smoke, i made the mistake of only putting 1 away. I smoked it after it was in my humidor for 5 or 6 months. needed a roach clip to finish it off. not going to make that same mistake when i get my hands on a box or 2 next go round</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d give the shark a 95+ rating. I smoked a few of the sahrk when they were released , GREAT smoke, i made the mistake of only putting 1 away. I smoked it after it was in my humidor for 5 or 6 months. needed a roach clip to finish it off. not going to make that same mistake when i get my hands on a box or 2 next go round</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bp</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/06/17/cigar-review-arturo-fuente-anejo-robusto/#comment-8473</link>
		<dc:creator>bp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-8473</guid>
		<description>gotta disagree sport, my take is it is the best size in the line.  Always been smooth, full and tasty. although they do get better with age</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotta disagree sport, my take is it is the best size in the line.  Always been smooth, full and tasty. although they do get better with age</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Reviews of the Week #29 (June 21 2008) @ Cigar Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/06/17/cigar-review-arturo-fuente-anejo-robusto/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Reviews of the Week #29 (June 21 2008) @ Cigar Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] than impressed&#8221; and a 90 rating. Interesting. Read the full review here&#8230; Read the review of Arturo Fuente Anejo Reserva No. 55 at Cigar Inspector&#8230;   (No Ratings Yet) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than impressed&#8221; and a 90 rating. Interesting. Read the full review here&#8230; Read the review of Arturo Fuente Anejo Reserva No. 55 at Cigar Inspector&#8230;   (No Ratings Yet) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyisles</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/06/17/cigar-review-arturo-fuente-anejo-robusto/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>nyisles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Simple, I was expecting it to be more like a 93/94.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple, I was expecting it to be more like a 93/94.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/06/17/cigar-review-arturo-fuente-anejo-robusto/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-24</guid>
		<description>How can you be less than impressed but still give the cigar a 90 rating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you be less than impressed but still give the cigar a 90 rating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

