<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: ITC 10th Anniversary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/07/10/review-itc-10th-anniversary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/07/10/review-itc-10th-anniversary/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews. Cigar Smokers and Shops – A Cigar Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITC 10th Anniversary Salomon &#171; Keepers of the Flame</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/07/10/review-itc-10th-anniversary/#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>ITC 10th Anniversary Salomon &#171; Keepers of the Flame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-3157</guid>
		<description>[...] gives the Toro an 86 for A Cigar Smoker&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gives the Toro an 86 for A Cigar Smoker&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stew</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/07/10/review-itc-10th-anniversary/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I could not believe that they patched the cigar. You should write Rocky, I bet he sends you a ton of cigars to make up for it. Personally I liked this cigar and smoke it from time to time. I will be checking the wrapper carefully though the next time I purchase one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not believe that they patched the cigar. You should write Rocky, I bet he sends you a ton of cigars to make up for it. Personally I liked this cigar and smoke it from time to time. I will be checking the wrapper carefully though the next time I purchase one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2008/07/10/review-itc-10th-anniversary/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigarsmoker.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Thanks Barry for reviewing the ITC10th, sorry it failed expectations! I will probably still scoop one--they&#039;ve got a sampler of the RP Decade and the ITC10th out that I&#039;ve been eyeing. I can not believe they patched an anniversary edition cigar. I still have high regard for RP, w/ two of my favorite cigars being his 92 and 99 Vintage. Enjoy the travels--thanks for linking up our sight. I&#039;ll get you added as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Barry for reviewing the ITC10th, sorry it failed expectations! I will probably still scoop one&#8211;they&#8217;ve got a sampler of the RP Decade and the ITC10th out that I&#8217;ve been eyeing. I can not believe they patched an anniversary edition cigar. I still have high regard for RP, w/ two of my favorite cigars being his 92 and 99 Vintage. Enjoy the travels&#8211;thanks for linking up our sight. I&#8217;ll get you added as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

