<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: Padilla Series &#8217;68</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews. Cigar Smokers and Shops – A Cigar Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-57987</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-57987</guid>
		<description>I think I need to ad, that this review is of the 68 made by a different factory then those that are out now. One of the drawback of Padilla is the constant changing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I need to ad, that this review is of the 68 made by a different factory then those that are out now. One of the drawback of Padilla is the constant changing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpro</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-57985</link>
		<dc:creator>mpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-57985</guid>
		<description>very disapointing smoke. Rosomax hits it on the head Damp Grass. cigars have an almost greenish raw look. Letting mine sit and age and hoping for the best&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very disapointing smoke. Rosomax hits it on the head Damp Grass. cigars have an almost greenish raw look. Letting mine sit and age and hoping for the best&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgrambo</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-56336</link>
		<dc:creator>dgrambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 18:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-56336</guid>
		<description>I smoke these Padilla 68&#039;s most often, even though I have 32&#039;s, Dominus&#039; and Miami&#039;s, O&#039;plenty. Just a stellar blend thats extremely satisfying. I like the robustos, lanceros and torpedos in that order. Its a fairly simple profile but very unique and like I said, very satisfying to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smoke these Padilla 68&#8242;s most often, even though I have 32&#8242;s, Dominus&#8217; and Miami&#8217;s, O&#8217;plenty. Just a stellar blend thats extremely satisfying. I like the robustos, lanceros and torpedos in that order. Its a fairly simple profile but very unique and like I said, very satisfying to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-54278</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-54278</guid>
		<description>I finally smoked a &#039;68 the other day. I have been enoying the hell out of Padilla&#039;s Achilles, and the &#039;68 went along that same line, except it&#039;s more expensive. ButGod, I love the Corojos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally smoked a &#8217;68 the other day. I have been enoying the hell out of Padilla&#8217;s Achilles, and the &#8217;68 went along that same line, except it&#8217;s more expensive. ButGod, I love the Corojos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROTHNH</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-12413</link>
		<dc:creator>ROTHNH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-12413</guid>
		<description>Cranks up the flavor and strength of the &#039;48 just a notch, keeping it firmly in the medium range -- never overpowering, making this Padilla Series &#039;68 sit, as intended, square in the middle of Ernie&#039;s cigars&#039; spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cranks up the flavor and strength of the &#8217;48 just a notch, keeping it firmly in the medium range &#8212; never overpowering, making this Padilla Series &#8217;68 sit, as intended, square in the middle of Ernie&#8217;s cigars&#8217; spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticks</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-9887</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-9887</guid>
		<description>I like much of what Padilla has to offer but the &#039;68 was for the most part flavorless. Started out low in the flavor department and went downhill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like much of what Padilla has to offer but the &#8217;68 was for the most part flavorless. Started out low in the flavor department and went downhill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g.moto</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-7325</link>
		<dc:creator>g.moto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-7325</guid>
		<description>Rosomax...you are not the only one who dislikes the &#039;68.  I am very disapointed.  I was very excited to try the Padilla&#039;s.  Just received a sampler pack and I have 14 more of the Padilla&#039;s to smoke.  I hope I will enjoy the others,  Miami and Achilles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosomax&#8230;you are not the only one who dislikes the &#8217;68.  I am very disapointed.  I was very excited to try the Padilla&#8217;s.  Just received a sampler pack and I have 14 more of the Padilla&#8217;s to smoke.  I hope I will enjoy the others,  Miami and Achilles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosomax</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-4767</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosomax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-4767</guid>
		<description>Why am I the only one who dislikes the &#039;68?  I love the 1932 and enjoy the &#039;48, but &#039;68 tastes like damp grass to me.  The draw is loose, and that flavor gets pleasant maybe for a second third, but then again returns to lamentable damp grass taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why am I the only one who dislikes the &#8217;68?  I love the 1932 and enjoy the &#8217;48, but &#8217;68 tastes like damp grass to me.  The draw is loose, and that flavor gets pleasant maybe for a second third, but then again returns to lamentable damp grass taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexwebmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexwebmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello webmaster<br />
I would like to share with you a link to your site<br />
write me here <a href="mailto:preonrelt@mail.ru">preonrelt@mail.ru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXXIV</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/01/13/cigar-review-padilla-series-68/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXXIV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=671#comment-324</guid>
		<description>[...] Keepers of the Flame lit up a Taboo Twist. Cigar Inspector tried the La Aurora 1495 Cameroon. A Cigar Smoker reviewed a Padilla 1932. Stogie Review fired up a Casa Magna Colorado [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keepers of the Flame lit up a Taboo Twist. Cigar Inspector tried the La Aurora 1495 Cameroon. A Cigar Smoker reviewed a Padilla 1932. Stogie Review fired up a Casa Magna Colorado [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

