<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: Rocky Patel Vintage 1990</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews. Cigar Smokers and Shops – A Cigar Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Review: Rocky Patel Vintage 1990 Churchill &#124; FineTobaccoNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-53139</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Review: Rocky Patel Vintage 1990 Churchill &#124; FineTobaccoNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-53139</guid>
		<description>[...] brief glance around the online cigar community indicate that some people love this cigar (Barry at acigarsmoker gives it a 93), and some people are lost as to what makes it so special (one Puff user called it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brief glance around the online cigar community indicate that some people love this cigar (Barry at acigarsmoker gives it a 93), and some people are lost as to what makes it so special (one Puff user called it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-46537</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-46537</guid>
		<description>Much better than than the 1992.  It&#039;s ok but not my favorite.  I prefer the Pedilla Miami.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better than than the 1992.  It&#8217;s ok but not my favorite.  I prefer the Pedilla Miami.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Lugo</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-7791</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Lugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-7791</guid>
		<description>Rustmeiter: have you ever tried &quot;San Cristobal de la habana&quot;? it has similars (but betters) flavor notes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rustmeiter: have you ever tried &#8220;San Cristobal de la habana&#8221;? it has similars (but betters) flavor notes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-2361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-2361</guid>
		<description>Can you tell me any others with comparable flavor notes? Being new to cigars, I&#039;m still wantering through samplers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me any others with comparable flavor notes? Being new to cigars, I&#8217;m still wantering through samplers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Treichler</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Treichler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 03:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>My favorite cigar in the whole world!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite cigar in the whole world!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-609</guid>
		<description>This cigar is what got me into &quot;Premium&quot; smokes. I keep plenty on hand. In a word... I like em!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cigar is what got me into &#8220;Premium&#8221; smokes. I keep plenty on hand. In a word&#8230; I like em!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Command</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Command</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-601</guid>
		<description>I can never figure out why people like these so much.  They&#039;re just okay for me.  I guess that&#039;s why everything&#039;s subjective, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can never figure out why people like these so much.  They&#8217;re just okay for me.  I guess that&#8217;s why everything&#8217;s subjective, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/02/28/cigar-review-rocky-patel-vintage-1990/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acigarsmoker.com/?p=928#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah!  I like this cigar a lot.  It is an old stand by.  The price in my neck of the woods isn&#039;t bad either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah!  I like this cigar a lot.  It is an old stand by.  The price in my neck of the woods isn&#8217;t bad either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

