<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: Murcielago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/</link>
	<description>Cigar Reviews. Cigar Smokers and Shops – A Cigar Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawanda Hetz</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-13831</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawanda Hetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-13831</guid>
		<description>Hi

Very Helpfull inofromation thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Very Helpfull inofromation thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bats</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-9409</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-9409</guid>
		<description>Great list of top rated bats for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list of top rated bats for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7689</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7689</guid>
		<description>gotcha.  thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotcha.  thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7634</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7634</guid>
		<description>I like trying cigars with &#039;baccy from less common origins: Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru... Good on &#039;em!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like trying cigars with &#8216;baccy from less common origins: Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru&#8230; Good on &#8216;em!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshK</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7620</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7620</guid>
		<description>Does this mean Mexico is starting to grow some better tobaccos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean Mexico is starting to grow some better tobaccos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAM</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7617</link>
		<dc:creator>JAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7617</guid>
		<description>Barry You have the best Reviews , When eddie Ortega was at smoking cigars in elmsford I bought 2 Murcielago and 2 Mi barrio the Murcielago was a really good cigar in my top cigars so far</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry You have the best Reviews , When eddie Ortega was at smoking cigars in elmsford I bought 2 Murcielago and 2 Mi barrio the Murcielago was a really good cigar in my top cigars so far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7614</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7614</guid>
		<description>I gave you a Jaime Garcia reserva especial which is supposed to be a regular release in the summer of 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave you a Jaime Garcia reserva especial which is supposed to be a regular release in the summer of 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7613</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7613</guid>
		<description>yo Bar,

Is this what u gave me the other night?

AJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo Bar,</p>
<p>Is this what u gave me the other night?</p>
<p>AJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7596</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7596</guid>
		<description>Yup: sounds veerrrry nice! Another good review; thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup: sounds veerrrry nice! Another good review; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.acigarsmoker.com/2009/12/18/cigar-review-murcielago/#comment-7591</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acigarsmoker.com/?p=1984#comment-7591</guid>
		<description>I chose not to revise the list, it would of fell in at #12.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chose not to revise the list, it would of fell in at #12.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

