Cigar Review: Davidoff Puro d’Oro

ZCPuroDOroLabel

The other day I decided to have a cigar in the shop where it all started for me. The Humidor located at 9212 3rd Avenue in Brooklyn, NY is a neighborhood cigar shop with an eclectic  group of people and a great selection of cigars. The Humidor will always have a place in my heart and while smoking with the former owner of the shop the current owner, Angelo gifted me with some of the new Davidoff Puro d’Oro. This was a case of being at the right place at the right time. So Angelo I thank you for your generosity and your welcoming me back into the shop where it all began.

According to Davidoff they have made a triumphant return to their cigar making roots with the release of the new Puro d’Oro series. In keeping with timeless traditions, the Puro d’Oro is comprised of select all-Dominican tobaccos featuring the exclusive Davidoff Yamasa Wrapper. Available in four traditional  formats, all are finished with a pigtail cap and a gold foot ring embossed with the format name. The classic Davidoff 1940′s stye packaging stays true to its origins with each cabinet box containing a 25-cigar wheel wrapped in a white silk ribbon. The first “puro” ever produced by Davidoff the Puro d’Oro series a crowning achievement in a long aand storied legacy of passion and luxury.

Cigar: Davidoff Puro d’Oro
Size: 4 7/8 x 38 (Sublime)
Wrapper: Dominican Yamasa
Binder:
Dominican
Filler: Dominican
Strength: Medium
Twitter: @ZinoClassic

Zino Classic Puro d'Oro

Appearance and Construction: The Puro d’Oro features a Yamasa wrapper. Yamasa is the region in which the newest Dominican farm is located. According to the Good Life Diaries this is near Bonao. The wrapper has a few veins but only one really stood out and should not effect the overall quality of the cigar. The cap of the cigar features a classic looking pig tail. This small sublime cigar features a foot that was a little looser then I would like, but nothing to bad.

Flavor & Notes : Due to the size of the cigar I am not going to break it down into thirds. I will save this for when I get a more traditional size to smoke. Like most cigars produced by Davidoff this cigar has the classic Hendrik Kelner profile on the prelight draw of earthy notes consisting of hay, grass and straw with similar notes off of the foot. One lit the Davidoff Puro d’Oro has a buttery smoothness and a slight kick to it. There are some wood notes through the nose that I liken to the smell of a wood burning fireplace. There is also an underlying sweetness present that compliments the wood and earthy notes making this one delicious cigar with a slight anise on the finish.

Smoking Characteristics: I was a little concerned the sublime would smoke a little too fast but for the size it lasted well. All the samples I had burned well with a nice ash that held on well even with the small size. The draw was perfect and for the size it produced a nice amount of smoke.

Conclusion: This is not really a size I smoke so it was difficult for me to review. I will follow it up in a few weeks with another review of a more traditional size. The Yamasa wrapper provides a nice new smoking experience and is one that I think most cigar smokers will enjoy a lot.

Price: $9.50 MSRP
Score: 89





You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  • http://www.toastedfoot.com Matthew

    Nice review Barry; I’ll be on the lookout for this one, I actually prefer this size most of the time…

  • http://tikibaronline.blogspot.com/ dmj

    No Davidoff label on this one…so now we see the real reason behind those gold and leather Davidoff cigar bands that were introduced last year (costing $1200)–you can put one on these sticks so everyone around you knows you’re smoking a Davidoff!

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-17216-Tampa-Cigar-Examiner Tom Ufer

    Looks like a nice stick. I’m looking forward to the launch party next week!

  • WhamIAmTheMan

    this cigar………i think she is too small

  • JoshK

    +1 to dmj’s comment

  • Pingback: Toast of the Week | Toasted Foot | Cigar Reviews

  • mkr

    Went to Davidoff Puro D’oro event. Smoked the Delicioso among others. These cigars were way too strong for me. Thick, tight, dark-grey ash. High on the nicotine. I couldn’t finish half the cigar…felt sick. Smoke is very thick and rich. It tastes like pure dung hay. I would highly recommend passing on this if you like the light, creamy, and structured taste of Milleniums. Not to be crass, but I almost threw up.

    For the price, you should be able to find better alternatives. If you are looking for this type of harsh grass note smoke, go with Nicaraguan Padron Annis.

  • http://www.acigarsmoker.com Barry

    MKR,

    Sorry to hear you had a bad experience with the Puro d’Oro. The dark ash has zero to do with the strength of the cigar rather it has to do with the magnesium content of the soil where the tobacco is grown.

    Did you try the cigar on a full stomach or were you drinking a beverage. The nicotine effects people if their blood sugar is low.

    As far as the Padron I have to disagree. I have never heard of the Anniversary line described has a harsh grass notes. In fact many people consider the Padron Anniversary to be one of the smoothest smokes out there

  • mkr

    Thanks Barry,

    As you could probably tell, I’m not a cigar expert by any means. My preference on cigars is on the creamy, smooth side. I usually just smoke Davidoff Milleniums…it’s probably why I find most other cigars very harsh/over-pronounced. I just try to find a type that I can really enjoy…and these were just really harsh!

    The first time was on an empty stomach, since it was at the opening event. I started drinking water, then moved to a pellegrino lemonade. I took your advice and tried the Magnificos and Sublime again (on separate occasions), on a full stomach. I didn’t have the same “reaction” – if you will – as I did the last time, but I still thought they were quite harsh!

    I did have a 2005 Cuban Montecristo #2 that was aged for 5 yrs – which was more towards my style. Then I realized that the Puro could be pretty amazing after about 5 yrs of aging. I’d feel like the harsh tones would be quite subdued throughout that time.

    If you have any recommendations for cigars to broaden my horizons, please do!

  • Bob

    smoked quite a few Magnificos and Notables.Very very disappointing. No real flavor, terrible uneven burn, consatantly went out, horrible aftertaste. Tastes like manure and chemicals. Tasted like dirt….no character, no depth..no real taste. If these cigars are the result of years of blending and time something has gone wrong at Davidoff. I smoke Aniversario #3s on a regular basis…they are te best cigars out there but this new line is destined to fail.
    If Zino were still alive, this new line never would have made it in to production. What a disappointment. I am am a long time, true cigar smoker…trust me …don’t waste your money or time on these!

  • http://www.acigarsmoker.com Barry

    Bob-

    If the cigar went out often and the burn was bad it sounds like the storing of the cigar was an issue. My humidor is 70/70 and Ive yet to have an issue with the cigar going out and burning uneven.

    A cigar that smells like manure is considered to be the best compliment to a cigar grower.. never had one that tasted like manure since I don’t know what it tastes like :)

  • John M

    Haven’t had the sublimes, they are also a tad too small for me, but i am currently having a love affair with the deliciosos. Too bad that a few of you didn’t like these, but lucky for us cigar smokers, there is MUCH more out there for us to enjoy! For MKR who found this one too strong i also suggest the Davidoff Grand Cru No. 3, my “go to” for a nice mellow/smooth stick. Thanks for the review!

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: video game | Thanks to seo services, seo service and Etiketten drucken